Artificial Intelligence for Imbalanced Financial Classification and Its Societal Implications for Digital Trust: A Cost-Sensitive XGBoost–Transformer Ensemble
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15849/ijasca.220Keywords:
artificial intelligence, credit-default prediction, class imbalance, cost-sensitive learning, XGBoost, Transformer, digital trust, algorithmic accountability, AI and societyAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly mediates how financial institutions decide who is trusted, who is scrutinised, and who is refused — decisions that carry direct social consequences for individuals and communities. Automated credit-risk and fraud-assessment systems are deployed at a scale where their errors are not merely statistical but socially consequential, because they can restrict access to credit, widen financial exclusion, and erode public confidence in digital finance. This paper addresses one technical precondition for trustworthy deployment: reliable learning from severely imbalanced financial data. It treats the task as what the data actually measure — prediction of credit-card default rather than verified fraud — and proposes FraudShield, a hybrid framework that combines a gradient-boosting model (XGBoost), a Transformer-based tabular model, an adaptive gating mechanism that learns a per-instance weighting of the two branches, and a cost-sensitive decision layer that reflects the unequal social and economic cost of different errors. The framework is evaluated on the UCI Credit Card Default dataset (30,000 clients), whose positive (default) class comprises 22.12% of the observations — a ratio of approximately 1:3.52. The evaluation protocol splits the data before any preprocessing, fits target encoding and standardization within each training fold only, and applies SMOTE to the training folds alone. Under this corrected protocol, FraudShield attains an AUC-ROC of 0.943 and an F1-score of 0.892, and the cost-sensitive layer raises measured cost savings from 16.7% to 28.4% over the majority-class baseline. The paper interprets these results within a broader discussion of AI accountability, fairness, and digital trust, and argues that technically sound imbalanced-learning methods are a necessary — though not sufficient — condition for socially responsible automated decision-making in finance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Thunibat, Thamer A. Alrawashdeh, Khaldoun Khalil Habashneh, Ali Khaled QtaishatCopyright © The Author(s).
Articles published in the International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and its Applications (IJASCA) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
This license permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercial use, provided appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, and any modifications are indicated.
Authors retain the copyright of their published work and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the terms above.
Link
